Ok, after reading through several man pages, I got some answers (but not all) to my own questions... On Monday 06 August 2007 21:40, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > As far as I understand the procedure so far, there are several steps > involved (please correct me): > > 1) The device gets plugged in. The USB hardware sees it and sends an > interrupt. This gets to the kernel. > 2) The kernel examines the details of the device, loads appropriate modules > and instructs udevd (or is it hal?) to create a device node in /dev. This > gets logged in /var/log/messages. The kernel signals udevd to create a node. > 3) Then udevd (or hal? or what?) creates the device node, and also logs > this in /var/log/messages. After that, it sends a signal to the next > service that there is a new device node attached (is this true?). The signalling is done (afaiu) through dbus-daemon, aka messagebus service. It is supposed to be running. The daemon which receives the signal should be hald. > 4) This next daemon/service (which one??? autofs?) catches this signal, > reads off the device's label (if it has one), creates a new directory named > /media/label and modifies /etc/fstab accordingly so that /dev/device can be > mounted to /media/label. It also sets the permissions in some way (how??? > where does one configure them?). It then sends a signal to a > possibly-working service in a desktop environment (KDE or Gnome) that there > is a new device to be mounted. Ok, this is wrong. First, the /etc/fstab is no longer autoupdated. Hal reads off the properties for the device (label, filesystem, partition table, etc.), assigns everything else that should be known (mount point, permissions, ownership, etc.), and writes it down in it's own database. It does not actually create a mount point. After that, it should signal to "something" that there is a new device to be mounted. What is this "something"? > 5) The appropriate DE service gets that, invokes "mount /media/label" (or > gnome-mount? is that DE-dependant? what if there is no DE running, just a > WM like WindowMaker? or no X at all?), and after the mount, it puts an > appropriate icon on the desktop where a user can "click" to open a file > manager and read/write the data or whatever. The "DE/no DE" situations seem to differ. If there is a DE running, this "something" catches the signal, internal gears and wheels of DE start clicking, and eventually the device gets mounted using the hal database. A file manager is opened, and everyone is happy. In case of Gnome, the gnome-mount does the work (creates a mount point, reads off the data from hal, mounts the device), and it is called upon from gnome-vfs-daemon and/or gnome-volume-manager and/or other gnome-* stuff. As for KDE, the same thing happens, only with some other tools doing the work (which ones?). However, if there in *no* DE running, **nothing happens**. The device does *not* get mounted automatically, and one has to go about creating the mount point manually, and doing # mount -t something /dev/something /media/something by hand, in order to mount the device. After that, only root has access to the data (without further hassling), and everyone is *not* happy. So, which service should be doing this instead of me? Best, :-) Marko Marko Vojinovic Institute of Physics University of Belgrade ====================== e-mail: vmarko@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
