On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 07:44 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 23:14 -0400, Claude Jones wrote: > > On Thu August 2 2007, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 01:50 -0600, Reg Clemens wrote: > > > > I have not read all the postings coming up to this one. > > > > BUT, you mention 2.6.22 > > > > > > > > The last kernel that I was able to get vmware working with was 2.6.20. > > > > There may be a workaround for the later kernels somewhere, but if I were > > > > you, I would go out and pull (yum) one of the 2.6.20 kernels and install > > > > it. That will give you the kernel and the stuff that vmware-config.pl is > > > > asking for. > > > > > > Have you applied the vmware-any-any patches here: > > > ftp://platan.vc.cvut.cz/pub/vmware/? VMware Workstation works fine with > > > the latest kernel here. > > > > Same here - Installed vmware-server today - no big deal. I used the > > any-any-113 patch, and it worked perfectly. Got my Vista VM up this > > afternoon. That's on the current kernel. > > The 113 version seems to break suspend/resume on my Thinkpad, so I'll be > reverting to 112. If that's an issue for you, you may need to google > for vmware-any-any-112. Update: I removed and reinstalled the VMwareWorkstation RPM, re-applied the 113 update, and everything seems to work now. Conjecture: applying the n+1'st any-any update over the n'th may not work as expected. > > > -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
