On 04/08/07, peter volsted <pvolsted@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > hi > > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On 04/08/07, peter volsted <pvolsted@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> hi > >> > >> The last 24 hours the f6 mirrors has had a vast amount of f7 & f8 > >> packages in them, Yum ends up with unsolveable dependency problems and > >> so - luckily - declines to perform anything more usefull than vaste time. > >> I hope someone will clean up the mess soon. > >> > > > > Where? Which repository? Which mirror? Do you also see this on the > > master mirror? > > > > To "clean up" something you either need somebody who can reproduce it > > or somebody who is aware of a problem already. > > > fedora-development.repo: fc6 918, fc7 2895, fc8 3436 This is normal and unchanged for a very long time. It's not just like that for the last 24h. You've been chasing ghosts. fedora-development inherits packages, which have not been rebuilt, from Fedora 6 and Fedora 7. Only new builds get the .fc8 dist tag when they use %dist in the spec file. The Fedora 7 release notes explain why Fedora 7 contains packages with .fc6 in their release version. > baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/$basearch/os/> > that does not seem to answer. Update your bookmarks, because the directory layout has changed some weeks ago: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/ baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/$basearch/os/ Conclusively, are you aware that you don't refer to Fedora 6 but Fedora Development (aka rawhide)? You don't run Fedora 6 when you have that repository enabled. And yes, there are ordinary broken dependencies in fedora development. See the daily rawhide report on fedora-devel list or fedora-test list. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
