On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Andy Green wrote: > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > > # iwlist wlan0 scan > > ... i can see! i can see! ... > > > > > > does this look reasonable? at this point, i assume i would go into > > Yes it looks fine, but you are not associated to any AP. This is the > wired ethernet equivalent of not having a cable plugged in. You can try > to force association by hand if you like > > iwconfig wlan0 ap 11:22:33:44:55:66 <--- AP MAC > > or go on with your plan to do the same thing the official way... > > > network admin and configure wlan0 for the SSID, channel and so on, > > yes? > > Well, give system-config-network a try, I have had variable luck with > that recognizing the wireless interface as well. This is why I am > focused on doing it all on the commandline. i think i see your point. even after all the previous output looked good, when i ran system-config-network to configure the wireless interface, i tried to add a new wireless connection, and all i got for a choice of wireless card was "other wireless card." i was assuming i would at least get presented with the wireless interface that was in the laptop. and in that drop-down list of choices, the only broadcom chip was "Tigon3" which i'm guessing is not the right choice. but, really, i was hoping that the config utility would see the chip. was i being hopelessly optimistic and naive? rday -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
