At 2:57 PM +0100 8/1/07, Chris Jones wrote: >> As far as I can judge from my reading of newsgroups and mailing lists, >> CentOS is neither more nor less reliable than Fedora. > >I run Fedora on my home system, but uses Scientific Linux (RHEL clone) >at work, and can tell you for a *fact* Scientific Linux is much more >stable than Fedora. It simply doesn't get major package updates. All >that are pushed out are important security updates when needed. ... I'm not disagreeing with you about Scientific Linux, which I haven't used, but CentOS 4 recently had a very large major upgrade from 4.4 to 4.5, which I, as a new CentOS user hoping for the non-upgrade kind of stability, found rather upsetting. I was told that CentOS just follows RedHat, which had just done that to RHEL 4. Is Scientific Linux different? -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
