Re: pcspkr module not automatically loaded with 2.6.22 kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andre Robatino wrote:
Bob Chiodini wrote:
Andre Robatino (arobatino) wrote:
The pcspkr module is not automatically loaded anymore with the 2.6.22
module, though I can load it manually with "modprobe pcspkr".  I
filed the following as a kernel bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249124 [1]

and noted that in the kernel update announcement was the following,
which I don't understand:

* Thu Jul 12 2007 Dave Jones - Replace the pcspkr private PIT lock by the global PIT lock to
  serialize the PIT access all over the place.

Was the kernel the right component to file this under, or does some
other package need to be modified to interact correctly with the
kernel?

Links:
------
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249124



Andre,

PIT is programmable interval timer and is the clocking H/W that provides timing to the PC Speaker, among other things.

I suspect that moving the code that locks the device for a specific user/use out of the pcspkr driver generalizes PIT locking for all users of the device not just the pcspkr driver. I doubt it had anything to do with the module not being loaded after the kernel update.

What other packages were updated before you noticed the problem. Might be something to do with kudzu.

Bob...
I just verified that on my cleanly installed, fully updated, 32-bit SELinux-enabled i686 box, the kernel module is loaded automatically when booting kernel-2.6.21-1.3228.fc7, but not kernel-2.6.22.1-27.fc7. My father, who has a machine with the same properties but otherwise different hardware, has exactly the same problem. So there must be other people out there with the same problem and I'm at a loss as to why nobody else seems to have noticed it.
Andre,

Check dmesg and /var/log/messages for errors related to the pcspkr module. Does /etc/sysconfig/hwconf reference pcspkr?

As a workaround put modprobe pcspkr in /etc/rc.modules. That is if F7 still supports rc.modules.

Bob...

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux