Re: F7 nvidia-96xx driver problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ed Greshko writes:

Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:15:52 +0800
Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm not trivializing your experiences, just saying that not all people share
your experiences and it may be best to note that in your replies.

I can't disagree with your statement here, but that's really not the point that
Mr. Friedman has been incorrectly asserting.

All I can say is that I do not recall any instance of someone posting
problems here on the Fedora list with the open "nv" driver any anyone
jumping in with a fix.

I don't recall anyone posting problems here with the open "nv" driver, period.

But that's not the point. The point that if someone did post a similar problem, then most people, myself or anyone else for that matter, could at least look at it, and do some poking to eliminate the most common problems. At the very least one could locate where any error messages are coming from, in the source code, which would narrow down, somewhat, the problem's domain. If the "nv" driver was crashing and taking down all of X.org, as a result, a backtrace can also be obtained, against pointing the finger in the general direction of the culprit.

None of the above is possible with the non-free binary blob. What kind of diagnostics can you do with it? Bupkis, that's what. Oh, there may be some rudimentary peeking and prodding one might be able to do, perhaps. But not to any extent the same level of debugging one can do with free drivers.

Last year, Mesa began crashing and taking down all of X, on an old Voodoo card that I have in one box. Yes, an old Voodoo card still had more than adequate accelerated OpenGL driver support -- more than enough to run MythTV on it. After taking down the backtrace, and dumping some additional debug info into the right Bugzilla, a few months later someone found the bug and fixed it.

Imagine that. Now what would be the chances of taking an old Nvidia card, for which Nvidia has discontinued all official support in their binary drivers -- because they want you, of course, to buy their latest heat dissipator -- and have anyone do /anything/ about this kind of a problem? I give you three guesses, and the first two don't count.

And /that/ is precisely the point. The original poster, I'm afraid, is royally boned. If he can't find the right toggles and prods to twiddle in his BIOS configuration, or some obscure X setting, he's boned.

Attachment: pgp1OhKFWjBv6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux