On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 14:22 -0400, Andrew Parker wrote: > On 7/24/07, Aaron Konstam <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I am trying again to get a clue of what exactly is different about > > kernels with ez in there version information. I can't find it on google > > and no one has responded to my question. Someone out there must know the > > answer. I would appreciate knowing what it is. > > If its been installed by rpm, the following may help: > > rpm -qfi /boot/vmlinuz-$(uname -r) > > If that's a no such file or directory error then pick a file in /boot > or /lib/modules that corresponds to the kernel > > Whilst you can't tell which repository that came from, you can get a > good idea from the build host. > > /var/log/yum.log may tell you when it was installed if done, as would > rpm if i could be bothered to work out the syntax. > Look people. The ez kernels exist and boot my machine. They were installed by the normal update GUI after the first one which I installed for some reason which I can't remember. Maybe I need to google some more. -- ======================================================================= Heaven, n.: A place where the wicked cease from troubling you with talk of their personal affairs, and the good listen with attention while you expound your own. -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary" ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
