On Monday 23 July 2007, David Boles wrote: >on 7/22/2007 9:37 PM, Andy Green wrote: >> Somebody in the thread at some point said: >>>> Nobody needs to make a case against the convicted felon. The only case >>>> yet to be made is against lack of real punishment of the criminal and >>>> its body parts. >>> >>> "the convicted felon"? Just who are you calling "the convicted felon"? >> >>really BIG snip for the list< > >Andy. Thanks for all of the links, I have seen them before, but they, and >you, still have not answered my question. > >Name the 'convicted felon' that was referred to here. None of the things >listed in your links are felonies. they are, no lawyer here, probably >civil law suits. Violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act are most certainly a felony. RICO also comes to mind. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Why, every one as they like; as the good woman said when she kissed her cow. -- Rabelais -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
