Re: Can Linux beat XP in homes yet or NOT?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mustafa Qasim wrote:
Salam!
I want to ask all you folks there that we can see the current advancements in Fedora and Ubunto distros. They've came onto screen as an OS not only for server's operated by GEEKS but also a much secure and user friendly OS for home users but still a large amount of our home user's are still stick with XP(especially here in Pakistan) . Do we need to create awareness at root grass level? Is it due to the Installation,configuring softwares and migrating data or other smiler issues that are the giant hurdle for home users? A XP user is still satisfied with Spyware,Trojan,dialer,virus an many other attacks but he didn't dare or didn't have enough guidance to get rid of it by using Linux.

I've tried to talk with my some friends about these issues but at the end i came to know that they didn't need to listen the philosophy of FOSS they just want me to practically prove that Linux is much easier and secure then Windows. For them installing software from source or concept of mounting a block device is much difficult because they didn't have to do this in M$ XP :p.

"What" and more importantly "How" we individuals can serve to make our people at root grass level aware about the weakness and black holes of their existing platform and the advantages of Linux over M$ XP?
It comes down to utility. I'm sort of a semi-geek; I've been running Linux on my n-1 box since RH 6. I will never be free of Windows, though, because I have two critical apps which I cannot run under wine, and for which suitable replacements (according to MY requirements) do not exist. As long as that situation exists Windows will be the dominant desktop OS. Will either of those apps be ported to Linux? Probably not. One is semi-orphaned, and the other is from a vendor who sees no advantage in committing resources to what they view as a marginal platform. Add to that the fact that separate versions must be packaged for every supported distro and release, and the chances of a vendor who is, after all, in the business of making money, making a major commitment to Linux approaches zero. I don't see this changing as long as each Linux vendor has its own architecture and packaging model. It's great for providing geeks with a topic of conversation at Users Group meetings, but not so good for convincing the non-geeks among us that Linux is good for them, too.
   Cheers,
Gordon Keehn

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux