Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> It should be seen as a later version, so it should upgrade.
It would appear so to human parsers, but not to rpm (unless I've done
something wrong with the fedora-rpmvercmp script :).
> If RPM has problem with your naming, you can also use the Epoch tag.
Epoch is nasty and should be avoided whenever possible. Once you use
it in a package, you're stuck with it for a long time. It's much
better to fix the version and release tags so that rpm will do what
you need it to do with an epoch.
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't
matter and those who matter don't mind.
-- Dr Seuss, "Oh the Places You'll Go"
Attachment:
pgpeWc7CFS8Lk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
