David Boles wrote: >> No, I was kind of bored with the whole thing. ;-) > > Yeah. Me too. I was hoping a long crappy post would kill it. I'll stop if > you will. ;-) OK, I will...after this last one...regardless of what you may say after you read below. :-) >>> That part, about NVida, was put in just to show that a Newbie that can't >>> figure out how to do this in the first place sure as heck will not know >>> how to fix it. >> That's good. >> >> I put my $.02 in (relevant or not) just to point out that the closed source >> folks do fix reported problems in a timely manner. ;-) > > NVidia is pretty good about that? You did read that article just as you > skiped my rant. Known about in 2004, maybe existed before, and fixed in > Oct 2006 does not impress me a rapid response? I read the article....but I couldn't find any evidence other than the article that the flaw was reported to nVidia back in 2004. So, all that I'm saying is the bug, according to http://www.rapid7.com/advisories/R7-0025.jsp, was report in Oct 2006 and fixed in 2006. > I have nvidia video. Have for years. Don't use the 3D drivers. Don't need 'em. Sounds like a choice. Isn't that nice that with Linux we have that luxury? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
