Michael Schwendt <mschwendt <at> gmail.com> writes: > Perhaps this is kde-redhat. And then the mass-updates theory applies. Or a conflict between the kde-redhat packages and the official FC6 updates. In either case, this should be reported to Rex Dieter. > > Also note that it has only been broken for 2 weeks for those who use > > updates-testing, the update only went to updates 1 week ago. So those who > > already had the breakage for 2 weeks deserve it. > > Great attitude. NOT! Updates-testing is overrated. It is not known how > few users actually have it enabled. Those who don't have it enabled aren't those who IMHO "deserve" breakage. Those who do have updates-testing enabled and don't report the breakage are the ones I'm complaining about, they really shouldn't complain about the breakage not getting fixed. The same goes for kde-redhat testing and unstable. Now if the broken packages have actually been in kde-redhat stable for that long (I don't know when 3.5.7 for FC6 went "stable" at kde-redhat), the situation is different. > Just for the record, I do have F7 updates-testing enabled, and I've reported > breakage in the KDE 3.5.7 packages. But unfortunately the breakage you reported can't be fixed without entirely replacing a package (syncekonnector by libopensync-plugin-synce), which hasn't happened yet. See the long discussion over bug #244917 for the hairy details: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244917 Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
