On Wednesday 04 July 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 02:52 +0000, Thufir wrote: >> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:30:31 -0700, David Boles wrote: >> >> I see what you mean. That would be nice, but I'd simply rather have >> >> more packages in fedora yum and better integration with other yum >> >> repositories, like one-click to add livna, for example. >> >> >> >> Given limited resources, that's my preference, at least. >> >> >> >> -Thufir >> > >> > Fedora is in the USA and they can not provide that information about >> > 'third party sites'. Or even acknowledge that they exits as I understand >> > it. So I greatly doubt you will get a click 'n' go link from within >> > Fedora. ;-) >> >> I don't think that it has to do with being the US or not, it relates more >> to Fedora only distributing GPL packages. > >Me thinks you are missing the point: > >It is lawful for sites in the US to provide pointers to sites hosting >software which is lawful Methinks you meant unlawful, did you not? >to distribute in the US. With RH being a US >based enterprise, RH/Fedora can not provide such pointers, no matter >what the causes are for why certain SW is being "outlawed in the US". > >Ralf -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Mal: "We've done the impossible, and that makes us mighty." --Episode #1, "Serenity" -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
