Re: Problem with yum after upgrading

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 1:22 PM +0200 7/3/07, Frank wrote:
>  Hello list.
>
>  I did an unsupported upgrade of my system from FC5 -> FC6 -> F7
> and now i need unofficial help :)
>
>  Problem is, that my yum is failing when doing bigger things. Bigger means,
> that a "yum install xxx" or "yum uninstall yyy" is working as long as
>there are
> no bigger dependencies. When doing something bigger I get an error message
> like the following:
>
>########
>[root@mimas ~]# yum groupupdate Base
>Setting up Group Process
>fedora                    100% |=========================| 2.1 kB    00:00
>updates                   100% |=========================| 1.9 kB    00:00
>primary.sqlite.bz2        100% |=========================| 3.8 MB    00:16
>Package parted - 1.8.6-4.fc7.i386 already installed and latest version
>Package logrotate - 3.7.5-3.1.fc7.i386 already installed and latest version
>Package at - 3.1.10-11.fc7.i386 already installed and latest version
>Package traceroute - 3:2.0.3-1.1.fc7.i386 already installed and latest version
>Package crontabs - 1.10-14.fc7.noarch already installed and latest version
>Package bzip2 - 1.0.4-10.fc7.i386 already installed and latest version
>Package tmpwatch - 2.9.11-1.i386 already installed and latest version
>Package vixie-cron - 4:4.1-82.fc7.i386 already installed and latest version
>[...]
>Resolving Dependencies
>--> Running transaction check
>---> Package firstboot-tui.noarch 0:1.4.35-1.fc7 set to be updated
>---> Package krb5-workstation.i386 0:1.6.1-2.1.fc7 set to be updated
>Traceback (most recent call last):
 ...
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/rpmsack.py", line 127, in
>searchPrco
>    if not result.has_key(po.pkgid):
>TypeError: list objects are unhashable
>######
>
>  I have already deinstalled and reinstalled yum and python-2.5 but
>that didn't help.
> I guess I might have some old library somewhere on the system that is
>not in the
> RPM database, but I didn't find one by now.
>
>  BTW, i did the same upgrade on another system (to be exact a bit more, from
> FC4 up to F7) last week and that one is running without any problems.
>
>  Does someone have a hint for me maybe?

Bugzilla, I think.  The message "list objects are unhashable" seems like a
bug in yum and shouldn't be caused by doing a yum upgrade.  I note that you
are doing "yum group*" commands, which aren't used so much.  Does a "yum
update" also faile?
-- 
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:'                       <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
      '                              <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux