Re: Setting up Eclipse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

* Charles Curley <charlescurley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2007-03-15 23:18]:
> I'm trying to set up Eclipse 3.2.2 on my laptop. The first problem I
> hit is that the locations available for saving extensions are all in
> root territory, /usr/share and /usr/lib. So of course as a non-root
> user I can't write to them. Is there a location for local storage of
> extensions? No, that would be too easy.

Actually, we carry a patch in our Fedora Eclipse packages to enable
users to install into ~/.eclipse.  It should be transparent to a user
who attempts to install something via an update site.  For those playing
along at home, you'll be interested to note that this patch is finally
getting applied upstream since Windows Vista apparently doesn't like
non-root/administrator users writing to application directories ...
fancy that :).

> OK, I can add to the list of extension locations. I click on that, and
> get a list of directories in my home directory. No .directories show,
> e.g. .eclipse, etc. Great.

You shouldn't need to do this, but okay.

> So I built the whole tree by hand, selected it, and Eclipse insisted
> on restarting. Someone please tell the developers that this is not
> Windows.

:)  Take that up with upstream.

> I then started looking for extensions. Again. For each repository,
> Eclipse wants to know, again, my preferred mirror. Is there any reason
> Eclipse can't salt that information away in a properties file?

I'm confused as to what you're trying to do.  However, note that the
update manager is being completely re-written.  It was written in the
early days of Eclipse and hasn't aged very well.  I'm sorry that this
isn't comforting right now but it will be fixed in the future.

> Is everything in Eclipse this brain-damaged user hostile? Is this a
> test designed to limit Eclipse users to uber-geeks?

Can you elaborate on what you were trying to install?  I'll see if I can
duplicate your problems.  Note that due to the nature of our java stack,
plugins you install with the update manager don't have the benefits of
corresponding natively-compiled .sos so you may notice performance
issues with them.

Andrew

Attachment: pgpDlndd4nnnf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux