On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 19:12 +1030, Tim wrote: > obert Locke: > >>> But, one thing I have learned to NOT do, is to set my sorting on > the > >>> Date column. I have no down or up arrow on the date column. > > Tim: > >> As one of those YMMV moments, I have threading turned on, *and* > messages > >> sorted on date (newest topmost). Things are working fine for me. > > Robert Locke: > > It's only a "problem" for me if I delete the first message of a > thread, > > though, admittedly, I tended to sort it "oldest" first.... > > Same here, I just wrote it wrong, before. I should have wrote > *oldest* > topmost... Since I don't do it the other way, I don't know if there's > a > problem that way around. Just in case that's important to someone > else > working through all of this. > > > Sorting appears to be done on the first message in the thread. When > that first > > message in the thread is deleted, the remainder of the thread is > > "relocated" to an appropriate spot. > > Since I turned off hiding deleted messages, I haven't seen the order > scramble around. I just turned it back on and tried deleting some > mail. See Tim I knew you were the one who told me that unhidding messages would solve my problem. > -- Aaron Konstam <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
