Re: Digikam 0.9.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dotan Cohen wrote:

> Although digikam 0.9.0 is available in extras, I'd like to install
> 0.9.1 as it includes two 'killer features' that are important to me. I
> have no problem installing from tarball, but before I do I'd like to
> know if I have any other options. I suppose that I could create an
> rpm, would that be worth the trouble for a single install? I wouldn't
> be able to maintain the rpm in a public repo so I'm not sure if the
> effort is worth it. What does the Fedora community think?

Ask Fedora's digikam maintainer to update to 0.9.1 would be the
easiest/sanest approach, imo:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/
against Extras/digikam.

-- Rex

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux