Aaron Konstam wrote:
All this attack stuff is very interesting but Res's point if it can be
expanded is as follows: When Rahul posts he should make it clear if he
is posting as an individual or as a member of the Fedora Project Board.
My point is that it simply does not matter for the current discussion.
All the talk about @redhat.com ids and official positions is just hand
waving and I refuse to get into that game.
Personally I get tired of people saying that Fedora is not a RedHat
product. Repeat to self the motto: If it walks as a duck .....
1) It not a product at all from Red Hat or otherwise. It is available as
ISO images for download and never sold.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAQ#head-97c8fd6a42741eeb20195b4f7ddcc9f561712455
2) As one measure, Fedora has more packages maintained by folks outside
of Red Hat folks than inside it and a lot of extras packages are
maintained by Red Hat folks in their own interest. That is even ignoring
translation, documentation etc.
Rahul
