On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 06:50 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Res wrote: > > > > > This is the funny thing, Fedora tots itself as "bleeding edge" > > Where? > > > yet only do so called security backports to stuff, like the ol true RH > > used to, which was cool because RH never promoted itself as bleeding edge.. > > Factually incorrect. By last count, only about 10% in Fedora Core > updates is backports. If you take into consideration Fedora Extras the > percentage would probably go down even further. > > > it seems its bleeding edge only when it suites them > > It is absolutely maintainer's decision. Bleeding edge on pretty much all > packages is called "Fedora Development". > > Rahul > That is strange. Nearly every week someone atacks a poster who complains about the latest Fedora by saying Fedora is supposed to be bleeding edge. If they want stability they are told to go to a different version of Linux. Is that opinion not shared by the Fedora Board people? -- ======================================================================= You look like a million dollars. All green and wrinkled. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
