On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 17:19:34 -0600, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The one that matters is that fedora isn't suitable for machine that need > to be stable and reliable. I've always thought that a quick, easy > solution to most surprises would be to let yum take a date/time option > and ignore all updates after that time. That way you could stay almost > up to date on your critical machines while watching the mail list for > complaints by people with the newer changes. And, you could update a > test machine and after testing, reliably update other boxes to the same > versions that you tested even if new updates had gone in the repository. You'd probably want the time specified as an interval to lag, rather than a date.