On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 00:47 +0100, M. Fioretti wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 18:29:32 PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik > (mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > Five-seven years ago, rpm was, hands down, the technically superior package > > management system. But it failed to keep up with the times. Rather than > > fixing fundamental defects in rpm > > which fundamental defects, sorry? It really should have some way to record the repository a package was pulled from in the rpm database itself.
