On Tuesday 20 February 2007 10:16, Mark Knoop wrote: > At 18:42 on 19 Feb 2007, Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Oxford English Dictionary (which I would think was fairly > > > definitive) notes the use of sheeps. > > > > Not in my copy - though of course few of us, if any, would have the > > full OED. Would you like to post the entire entry? > > I subscribe to the website version (http://dictionary.oed.com/). The > plural is mentioned after definition 1a. This is the basic entry, I've > not included the various spellings, etymology or quotations... > > sheep, n. > > 1. a. Any animal of the ruminant genus Ovis (sometimes horned), > closely allied to the goats; esp. of the widely domesticated species > Ovis aries, of which there are many varieties, and which is reared for > its flesh, fleece, and skin. The male of the sheep is a ram, the female > a ewe, the young a lamb. The flesh of the adult sheep is mutton. The > fleece yields wool, the skin is made into leather or parchment, and the > intestines are used for the strings of musical instruments (see CATGUT). > > pl. with -s. > <grin> Far more quote than I intended :-) My copy is a very well-thumbed "Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English", 1964. It has a very long entry of which the first part is sheep, n. (pl.the same) 1. Kinds of wild or domesticated, timid, gregarious woolly occas. horned ruminant of which male is named ram, female ewe & young lamb. It goes on to refer to sayings and quotations about sheep, then sheepish personal types, and the various derivatives of sheep~. It's quite definite about the plural, you'll notice. After all, you would say 'a flock of gulls', but you wouldn't say 'a flock of sheeps' - or would you? :-) The Collins English Dictionary, of more recent vintage, is also definite that the plural is sheep. Of course there is the possibility of American English having a different usage. Anne
