Re: Ack! I've been rooted...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/02/07, Steven W. Orr <steveo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I read this thread and I have a question on why this problem is not
handled in a more direct approach instead of the blood&guts reload
approach: If you simply reinstall the rpm package (something like)

rpm --replacepkgs -vh rpm-4.4.1-22.i386.rpm

then you know that the binaries are good. From there all you have to do is

Well that's not quite true, is it. Presumably you suggest is to
reinstall rpm because of the possibility that it has been hacked. But
if you're using a hacked version of rpm to reinstall it, you can't be
sure that it is doing as it is supposed to - i.e. the hacked rpm could
be just spitting the package into /dev/null whilst appearing to
reinstall it.

--
Mark Knoop

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux