On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 19:43 +0000, Steve Searle wrote: > Is anyone else seeing these mangled, or is it just me? Mangled in different ways (poor quoting style when replying). I've seen paragraphs in the right places, except for one post from them, where it looked like they'd use <pre> around a section. They're posting a multipart alternative message, using quoted-printable encoding of the plain-text and HTML sections. By now, all mail clients should be able to handle quoted-printable (it's a many-years-old technique), though it appears that some do not. (Which, like HTML and format=flowed, allows a paragraph to reflow and fill the reader's window.) Microsoft's OE always made a mess of quoting when it was sending using quoted-printable encoding. It looks like their latest abomination of Hotmail is just as bad.
