-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gene Heskett wrote: > > Well, one thing that isn't a state secret as of right now around the > Heskett ranchette is that the 'fixfiles -F relabel' operation will screw > with your backups because (I assume) all the ctimes of all the files will > be updated. I have a tapetype size set at about 9.5GB, and a normally > done backup, on a 5 day schedule will amount to about 5.5GB per nightly > run. It tried to do the whole 27GB in one swell foop last night. And > predictably ran out of 'tape' so there is about 3.3GB left in the holding > disk after the compression. Amanda will autoflush that tomorrow night, > so its not a huge problem, but it sure will mess with the old girls > scheduling algorithms for the next few dumpcycles. > > So the question then is: Is this unavoidable, or should I file a bz > against it? The manpage doesn't mention anything in this regard. > Might I suggest that you ask your question on the fedora-selinux-list where the selinux experts are? fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx - -- David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFFsjP5AO0wNI1X4QERAtGCAJ9d3mJie9ZyUHtAvdWLtZR2JeBGnwCg5StW +c7aR05rZfWdppriIY89Z+I= =/c+X -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
