On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:24 -0800, David Boles wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Thursday 18 January 2007 12:04, Ric Moore wrote: > >> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:12 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > >>> You are absolutely right about the applications being compiled for > >>> libselinux. I tested this the hard way by ripping it out with rpm -ev > >>> --nodeps. Basically it hosed the system; the box would not even boot > >>> anymore. Kernel panic reared it's head early on in the boot process. > >> You're a good man Lyvim, thank you for giving it a go, now the rest of > >> us learned by your experience! :) Ric > > > > Yes, please add my thanks to the chorus too. > > > How long have you paranoid SELinux bashers been using Fedora Core? SELinux has > been in Fedora Core at least since FC-3 and I think that I remember it in > FC-2. So whatever it is that you don't want the world to see it could have > already seen. ;-) So Selinux Question=Stupid. Yeah, got it. > Google is your friend. If any of you would have spent a small part of the > time researching what SELinux really does and why it does it, as you have > bashing it incorrectly for what it does not do, this conversation would have > ended long ago. Haven't seen much bashing, but I have seen alot of questions being bandied about. But whatever cracks your chestnuts. > > This list has turned into a chat list and seeing this thread has ended for me. > 'Plonk'. Ahh well......so departs another of the New Castrati. LX
