On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 23:58 -0500, Claude Jones wrote: > [...] > > The rest is here: http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/5/5263/1.html > > So, my question is, if this is all true, then, what about [SELinux]? The thing about Windows is that it is entirely proprietary: Only Microsoft and select others can look at the source code (and perhaps not even the whole of it). SELinux, on the other hand, is entirely Free. It, like other kernel/security projects, is scrutinized by a great many (several hundred? thousand(s)?) developers from around the globe; not just one owner. Had anything similar found its way into SELinux, it would be quickly removed and the committing developer removed from the project most likely. :) -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF Associate Member #5015 GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
