On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 09:58 +1030, Tim wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 09:34 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > As was explained it is not necessary for the printer to have internal > > postscript printing capability as long aas the drivers exist. > > Yes, I'm well aware of that. The point raised was the ease of use for a > printer when it does support Postscript. More so, when it's networked. > (No driver issue anywhere, just a standard Postscript interface.) > I guess my counter-point is that I have never had any trouble in configuring non-postscript printers through cups and the right drivers. I have two such printers in my home network. But , of course, I have not tried this with all the non-postscript printers there are in existence. So I can't deny that someone might have problems in this arena. -- Aaron Konstam <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
