On Friday 15 December 2006 11:34, David Timms wrote: > Anne Wilson wrote: > > > > Name : gpg-pubkey Relocations: (not relocatable) > > Version : e42d547b Vendor: (none) > > Release : 3960bdf1 Build Date: Thu 14 Dec 2006 > > 11:07:30 AM GMT > > Install Date: Thu 14 Dec 2006 11:07:30 AM GMT Build Host: localhost > > Group : Public Keys Source RPM: (none) > > Size : 0 License: pubkey > > Signature : (none) > > Summary : gpg(Matthias Saou (Thias) > > <matthias.saou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) Description : > > Anne, from the man: rpm thinks of the gpg keys the same as packages, so > you should be able -e the ones that might be a problem. > Is the 'rpm -qa --info' command actually listing installed keys, or multiple installs of the same key? Apart from 'build date' I don't see any difference between them. > By the way, I can't see lshw in freshrpms, but in rpmforge. > Hmm - I wonder. I did a search to find which repo was offering it, then downloaded to do a localinstall. I did, at one point, look at rpmforge, but it seemed to be concerned with FC up to FC4? OTOH, the name of the package is lshw-2.09-1.fc6.rf.i386.rpm, which does look as though it could be rpmforge. Perhaps I've been totally confused from the beginning. That comes from going the long way around to find it, instead of installing and enabling all repos to use 'yum search'. Sorry if I've wasted everyone's time. Anne
Attachment:
pgplzCfY4lDtV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
