Re: nvidia vs kmod-nvidia

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jim Cornette wrote:
Hadders wrote:

I guess nvidia have done the easiest thing they can, which is provide a base and let the fanatics do what they will.


Of course releasing specs for those developing upstream projects would trickle down to all distribution variations by those that compile the programs that are based on the upstream kernel and GUI developers efforts.

There is nothing fanatical about not purchasing products that do not taylor to assuring or at least giving effort that their product will not fry or cause instability on any user's system.

I have the card because it was in the junkpile for parts I was given by another person. The funny thing is that I got rid of a prior nvidia card because of the lack of 3D OSS drivers available.

Anyway, nouveau (OSS 3D driver under development), the 2D nv driver included with the GUI, the scripted binary driver with a hook or not use any of the products that they sell with no intention to assure users that they work without disrupting an otherwise stable system.

Fanatical, rational or principled doesn't really matter. The driver is closed source from the supplier. You can do whatever you choose. The question was mainly why one form of the driver is better than the other. The posting that referenced Mike's feedback on the difference was pretty much what I tried to convey. I think the content was close, but the wording totally different.

Some kernel developers, one not currently working for Red Hat have commented regarding the effects of NoSourceDrivers and bug reports. Without the source, how can one determine reliably what is happening when the binary driver does bad things with otherwise stable systems.

Jim

My choice of the word "fanatic" was misplaced, "enthusiast" would be better.

Yeah, I could imagine the frustration of trying to debug something without the source. You'd go nowhere fast and everything would be guess work based on observation.

I guess my frustration comes in the fact as an end user to some extent. I'm just trying to get this working and would prefer to not have to jump through hoops. Of course, I will be the first to admit that I've made this hard for myself with my current hardware config. Otherwise, it would be as simple as a yum update from livna.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux