On 12/10/06, spmirowski <spmirowski@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I suppose you could argue that it's to much work for nvidia to support > one of the largest Linux distros. However, they seem to handle > supporting Windows okay, but then again, there's a much larger market > share and I'm sure there's a greater financial incentive. > > It would be nice to see nVidia support FC by incorporating livna, but > then again, I also understand it's easier for them from many many > perspectives to make the drivers available and let the distro fend for > itself. > > It would be silly to expect a nVidia to support a few distros specifically with packages. To support FC, they would need to build at least two version (5 and 6) then 586, or 686 kernels, plus SMP, etc. Now add a couple more popular distros and you have what 10 - 20 builds per driver version? What about the near most popular distros. They will whine and cry foul.
You do know that it is all automated (mostly) right? -- Fedora Core 6 and proud -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
