Re: udev device-persistence problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>T. Horsnell wrote:
>>> T. Horsnell wrote:
>>>> FC6 - kernel 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6 - udev-095-14
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to develop some rules to give me device-name
>>>> persistence on my SCSI disks. I have a couple of test rules:
>>>>
>>>> BUS=="scsi", PROGRAM="/sbin/scsi_id -g -u"
>>>> RESULT=="20004cffffe0e0976", NAME="dsk0_%n", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0700"
>>>> RESULT=="SSEAGATE_ST336807LC_3KT0CTTM00007530YTR2", NAME="dsk1_%n", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0700"
>>>>
>>>> With these rules disabled, I get:
>>>>
>>> <-------------[ SNIP ]--------------------------->
>>>
>>>
>>>> Why have I got both sd devices and dsk devices?
>>>> And what is the second line?
>>>> Why have I got an entry:
>>>> crw------- 1 root root 21,  0 Nov 28 11:45 /dev/dsk0_0
>>>>
>>>> This looks like a generic device, but if so, why only one?
>>>> And where are the normal sg devices?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> <-------------[ SNIP ]--------------------------->
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is this all as expected?
>>>> Am I going to be screwed later on if I need to do something
>>>> that requires a generic SCSI device for a particular disk?
>>>> Why do I still get /dev/sd* entries?
>>>> Any clues anyone?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Terry.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Unless you use OPTIONS="last_rule" in your rule, both your rule and
>>> the default rule will be used. So you will end up with both sets of
>>> device entries.
>>>
>>> Now, as for the order problem, you may need to change the program
>>>from "/sbin/scsi_id -g -u" to "/sbin/scsi_id -d %N -s %p" or
>>> "/sbin/scsi_id -d %N -s %p -g -u". What I suspect is happening is
>>> that scsi_id is not returning what you expect. From the scsi_id man
>>> page:
>>>
>>> scsi_id  is  one  of  the  tools used in the "Linux Persistent
>>> Device Names" scheme that creates persistent device links in
>>> /dev/disk. It is called with the -x option which will print all
>>> values in a defined format to let udev import it into its own
>>> environment for later event processing.
>>>
>>> An  example custom udev rule using scsi_id, that will name a block
>>> device and any partitions for the device matching the scsi_id output
>>> of 312345:
>>>
>>> BUS=="scsi", PROGRAM=="/sbin/scsi_id -d %N -s %p", RESULT=="312345",
>>> NAME="disk%n"
>>>
>> 
>> Thanks for this advice Mikkel, but so far it doesnt make any difference.
>> Here's my modified ruleset:
>> 
>> BUS=="scsi", PROGRAM="/sbin/scsi_id -d %N -s %p -g -u"
>> RESULT=="20004cffffe0e0976", NAME="dsk0_%n", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0700", OPTIONS="last_rule"
>> RESULT=="SSEAGATE_ST336807LC_3KT0CTTM00007530YTR2", NAME="dsk1_%n", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0700", OPTI$
>> 
>> And here's the results:
>> (There is actually a small difference. I now dont have a block-device
>> for dsk0, partition 1. /dev/disk0_1 has become a character device.)
>> 
>Where did you put your rules? If the file with your rules comes
>after the default rules, then both sets of rules will get used. I am
>not sure why the first partition is being set as a character device.
>It doesn't make sense, especially with /dev/sda1 correctly created
>as a block device.

[root@dev1 ~]# ls -1 /etc/udev/rules.d/
00-lmb_scsi.rules
05-udev-early.rules
40-multipath.rules
50-udev.rules
51-hotplug.rules
60-libsane.rules
60-net.rules
60-pcmcia.rules
60-wacom.rules
90-alsa.rules
90-hal.rules
95-pam-console.rules
bluetooth.rules

I've tried naming my rules file lmb_scsi.rules (i.e. should be accessed
last) and  00-lmb_scsi.rules (should be first). No effect.

I also use things like:

echo "scsi add-single-device 0 0 3 0" > /proc/scsi/scsi
echo "scsi remove-single-device 0 0 3 0" > /proc/scsi/scsi

to give me pseudo hotpluggable scsi disks, and if I 'remove-single-device'
all my scsi disks (I boot from ide on this test box)
then delete /dev/sd* and /dev/sg*, and then add  all the scsi disks again
using 'add-single-device', I dont get the sdX or sgX devices being recreated.

Furthermore, I've since noticed that unless I have a PROGRAM statement
in every rule in my ruleset, I get errors like:

Dec  5 16:03:47 dev1 scsi_id[3465]: scsi_id: unable to access parent device of '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:0d.0/host0/target0:0:4/0:0:4:0'

when I 'add-single-device' and

Dec  5 16:04:29 dev1 scsi_id[3535]: scsi_id: unable to access '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:0d.0/host0/target0:0:4/0:0:4:0'

when I 'remove-single-device'

Time to set udev_log="debug" ...

Cheers,
Terry


>
>Mikkel
>-- 
>
>  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
>for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
>
>-- 
>fedora-list mailing list
>fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux