Tom Rivers wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 12:18 -0500, Ferguson, Michael wrote:
Andy,
Thanks.
Route -n returns
Kernal IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmase Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.128.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.248.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 192.168.131.21 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
'preciate it.
Hi Michael,
Unless I'm missing something here, there is a mismatch in IP ranges.
Your first line references 192.168.128.0/255.255.255.248, yet the
default gateway is 192.168.131.21 which I don't think responds to a
192.168.128.0/255.255.255.0 network. You may want to check your IP
address for eth0, "ifconfig eth0", and make sure it's on the same class
C network range that your default gateway is. This kind of problem
would account for the "Destination unreachable" messages.
Tom
Tom,
he's using a supernet/CIDR block/classless (or whatever you want to call
it) addressing, his valid range would be from 192.168.128.1 through
192.168.135.254 so yes his gateway exists on his network.
Michael,
I've never tried using this type of addressing with Linux, assuming it
does in fact work, I would be interested in seeing what the output of
"/sbin/ifconfig eth0" is and if anything shows up in the arp table
"/sbin/arp -a" what its output is.
could you post the output of those?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list