Re: [OT] Protest the Novell-Microsoft Agreement - Sign Bruce Perens petition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 14:57 -0500, Jacques B. wrote:

> > Thus the predicate for not trusting the petition site as a means not to
> > sign is easily solvable with only a little amount of detective work.
> 
> Fair enough.  I wasn't suggesting it wasn't his work.  Just that it
> wasn't particularly obvious from reading his home page and from the
> rest of the info.  Something one would have expected seeing the
> importance of the topic to this individual.
----
given that there is information on his web page about his stand against
software patents in general
http://perens.com/Articles/PatentFarming.html, his being former project
leader of Debian Linux and self declared "spokesperson and one of the
leaders of Free Software and Linux" - it's not much of a stretch to
create the nexus of his motivation for his open petition to protest the
Novell-Microsoft agreement.
----
> 
> > As for not signing petitions that you don't understand, that's a
> > blinding glimpse of the obvious.
> 
> Better to admit ignorance than to try and mask it and lose credibility
> when the obvious surfaces, hence why I made that fact clear.  I could
> have read the info on Wikipedia and his sites and claimed otherwise.
> But I am not that kind of person (nor am I suggesting others who've
> posted are).  As for finding the time to read up on the topics
> pertinent to the debate in order to assume a justifiable position, I
> just don't have that time.  I leave that for those closer to the pulse
> to duel it out and hope that good will triumph over evil.  Better to
> have the issue debated by a handful of knowledgeable, competent people
> than a large group of ill informed or uninformed people.  That would
> hurt the cause more than help it.
> 
> Now if the issue was something to which I was more on the pulse of, I
> would quite possibly take a public stance on it.  We can't all be
> activists.  We can't be well versed on everything Linux.  We all
> contribute in different ways.  It would inappropriate to criticize
> someone for not getting involved without knowing a person's reasons
> (which is something that a person can choose to share or not).  A
> person can be a great contributor to Linux without getting involved in
> this petition or that issue as a whole.  My advice was if you are
> going to get involved, be well informed so that you can do so
> competently, don't you agree?
> 
> If anyone suggests otherwise, then they are being extremely unfair,
> unreasonable, and will risk doing more harm than good in their quest
> to further their side's position on the issue.
> 
> We only have to do two things in life, pay taxes and die.  Everything
> else is a choice (well so is not paying taxes but you know the
> saying...).  Fair enough to seek to raise awareness and involvement in
> a topic.  But not to expect it.
----
I guess that we all have well informed, or uninformed opinions on just
about everything in the universe...sort of whether we see the glass half
full or half empty I would suppose and we always have the prerogative of
changing our minds down the line anyway.

The fact that Linux, be it Fedora, Red Hat Enterprise, Debian or even
SuSE is capable of providing both a rich server and desktop environment
today is the result of the efforts of a great many number of people who
ardently believe in the concept of Free Software that is free for use by
users and not subjugated to corporate whim. If this issue isn't
important to you or other users of Fedora then I would suppose that you
have to ask yourself why you are using Linux and not Macintosh or
Windows.

The goals of Free Software are clearly delineated at http://www.gnu.org/
- Anyone using Linux and not familiar with the intentions of GNU or the
Free Software Foundation really needs to work through this since having
no informed position is simply not excusable.

I apologize for debating this since that was never my intent for the
posting...I actually give people credit for being able to discern
whether they want to sign or not sign a petition and can only wonder
what your motivation is for staking a position that it might be a
mistake for people to sign it.

Craig

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux