Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 25 November 2006 13:37, David G. Miller wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Lots of stuff deleted since the conversation has drifted...
Useing kde-3.5.5, I didn't notice that option in the tools supplied.
There was Kusr, and something called user manager. But the first time
I just ran 'adduser amanda'.
See Anne's recent post and correction. system-config-users lets you
manipulate group membership, etc.
I'll have to join the chorus of objections here. That tool doesn't seem
to be available anyplace on the kmenu. If thats the 'approved' tool to
do that, then it needs to be a heck of a lot more accessible than buried
someplace in an sbin directory that you have to issue a 'locate
system-config' and see what falls out with a name that *might* indicate
it what you want.
KDE may not see fit to include it since it's gnome-ish. It's Red Hat's
standard user/group config tool. Found with others of it's ilk in:
[root@bend ~]# which system-config-users
/usr/bin/system-config-users
Dumb question: why didn't you just do a "yum install amanda
amanda-client"? It's much easier than building amanda and manually
setting up the user, etc.
2 reasons,
1) whats in the repos is often a year or more out of date, and due to
the restrictions of the rpm packaging system usually has permission
problems that can only be sorted correctly by nuking the rpm and
following the build instructions to install the tarball. This is the
first time I've had problems installing a tarball in 6 years!
2) I'm one of the canaries in this particular coal mine, I make and
install the new snapshots as often as Jean-Louis releases them, so if
there are any gotcha's I can report back the next day on their lists.
Thats one of my contributions to your having the worlds best backup
software.
I like my backup software to be VERY stable so I'll put up with whatever
Fedora decides is sufficiently stable to include in their distro.
Fedora has taken perfectly good code, and broke it all to hell making it
fit in the rpm format, on several occasions. Often the packager doesn't
use it himself, and has no idea how to go about throwing it out in the
street to see if it can survive in traffic. Sorry if thats a bit too
candid an opinion, but back when I wanted to start using it, I screwed
around with whatever version was in rpm at the time for almost 3 months
fighting with perms, finally discovering the mailing list, and got
instructions on how to build it. The result worked the first night. And
every night since except for an obscure bug that effected several
snapshots in a row last spring, and a typo in the srcs of two snapshots,
probably 5 & 2 years ago. Stable? Yes, very. We have 10x the trouble
with gnu.org's ongoing screwing with tar, to the extent we now have a
list of tars that work and tars that will not recover. In that regard,
amanda is many times more stable that tar. But you folks always think
tar is stable, so you go get the last release, make an rpm out of it, and
apparently never actually test it in the real world. We do. Every
night...
>From time to time one of the packagers checks into the list, and tries to
understand the problems. But then like smoke in a whirlwind, gone again
for 2 years or more because we think this is a great time to get amanda
fixed, but your packager has thin skin & boogies. To get an idea of what
it can do today, go get the latest snapshot from Jean-Louis's site at
umontreal, link near bottom of page at amanda.org, unpack it, and read
the ChangeLog. I don't even know if it goes back as far as the version
fedora is currently shipping, but a lot of new capabilities have been
added since then, with the only backwards breakage being the timestamps
which once enabled in the wider format aren't compatible with
pre-timestamped archives that have only a date stamp.
I seem to have hit a hot button. I haven't had any trouble with the
amanda rpms. I'm currently running the server under CentOS 4.4 and
clients under Fedora 6 plus backing up my wife's Windoze box as a samba
share. About the only PITA was getting the tape changer configured
since it's really an HP changer (C1557A) that Sun resells.
With regard to this problem:
[amanda@coyote GenesAmandaHelper-0.5]$ ls -l /mnt/hdb/home
total 36
drwxr-xr-x 21 33 disk 4096 Nov 8 23:37 amanda
drwx------ 3 amanda amanda 4096 Nov 9 2004 elladene
drwx------ 14 502 502 4096 Nov 12 2002 elmer
drwx------ 36 gene gene 4096 Nov 9 16:32 gene
drwx------ 2 root root 4096 Oct 22 2002 lost+found
drwx------ 3 503 503 4096 Nov 21 2002 roadrunner
drwxr-xr-x 18 gene gene 4096 Aug 14 03:42 shop
drwxr-xr-x 19 1000 1000 4096 Aug 13 2004 shop-gene
drwxr-xr-x 6 1002 1002 4096 Dec 14 2005 spamd
find provides a mechanism for finding all of the files with a particular
UID or GID and then doing whatever you'd like with them. Something
along the lines of:
find / -uid 33 -exec chown amanda:disk {} \; -print
The predicate -gid can be used with numeric group IDs. If you want to
confirm the changes, use -ok instead of -exec.
Valid for the FC2 tree's, amanda is 501 on FC6. I probably am overdoing
it, but I (root) just 'chown -R amanda:disk *' from inside
the /home/amanda dir.
Point taken though. Thanks.
Just change the numeric UID or GID as needed. Also, I think amanda
likes to have some of the stuff under /etc/amanda owned by the amanda
user. But that could be a Red Hat-ism. 501 is probably what you get
for a UID by creating the user through one of the regular user
management tools. Amanda is still user 33 on my clean FC6 install.
It's usually a good idea to have system users like amanda have a UID
outside of the normal user range.
Cheers,
Dave
--
Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
-- Ambrose Bierce
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
