Re: Ubuntu reaches out to embarrassed SuSE devs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 13:53 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:


----
directly quoted from the article...

"My reaction is that so far, what he [Ballmer] said is just more FUD
[fear, uncertainty and doubt]," said Pamela Jones, editor of the
Groklaw.net blog, which tracks legal issues in the open-source
community. "Let him sue if he thinks he has a valid claim, and we'll see
how well his customers like it."

Officials at Red Hat Inc., the leading Linux distributor, also dismissed
Ballmer's comments. "We do not believe there is a need for or basis for
the type of relationship defined in the Microsoft/Novell announcement,"
said Mark Webbink, deputy general counsel.

This is simply Microsoft FUD - If you wish to buy into it, that's your
issue.

It seems pretty obvious to me that the moment that Microsoft files suit
against some large corporate user for infringement (they aren't likely
to sue a Linux distribution), that they will alienate the entire
corporate world. A bully doesn't beat up on people to project
strength...a bully merely threatens. Let them threaten all that they
wish - who's afraid of the big bad wolf?


Honestly, I'm beginning to believe that blatantly submarining like
this should somehow be illegal (as in, invalidate their claim).  If
they have a valid patent claim that they believe Linux violates they
should announce it so people know where they stand, as it affects the
end user as well as the distributor.  Surely the whole point of the
patent system[1] is that people know what the holder has a claim on
and can avoid using it if they don't want to.

Vague threats like this are automatically FUD, if there's really
something there the patent should have been published and they should
be able to point to it.  Unless they go to court they don't have to
tell you /how/ you're violating it, but if they think millions of
people and companies are somehow violating a patent they should have
the grace to say which one so we can make a choice.

[1] In general; the silliness of software patents specifically aside.
--
imalone

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux