Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 09:15 -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 02:02:18PM +0000, Andy Green wrote:
Probably the GUID is a bit of a red herring, since in the case there are
millions of boxes it will be a ton of work to maintain the database of
them and compare every log line against it, for limited hard
information.
Why? Just running uuidgen -r once per install and saving it somewhere is
good enough.
On the clients, yes. I was talking about the back end of processing the
logs from the mirrors. Ignoring yum caches, because the activity of
individual clients is not repetitive in terms of what is downloaded, you
can infer from n downloads of the same package from the same IP that
there are n clients behind the IP. If the IP is dynamic, makes no odds
you again see n download actions. So you get limited additional
information about a client being an individual from going to all the
trouble of tacking the GUID in a database.
Because boxes will typically download specific updated
RPMs just the once, you can get an idea of the number of active boxes
just by filtering on packages that have been updated for a while.
That's wrong assumption, many people use proxies to avoid downloading
updates for each box again and again.
----
or cases like I have just recently set up where I created my own
repository (yam soon to be known as depo) and all computers will
install/update from there and will never touch a fedoraproject
repository at all.
Yes, that why I said this six hours ago on this thread:
''Information is still lost or degraded for
...
3. Machines behind a local yum cache
Whatever tools are provided to run the yum cache should have the repo
log processing stuff folded into them, and report stats up to Fedora HQ
by default. But a user should be able to turn it off.
...''
-Andy
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
