Re: possibly hacked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 12:55 -0600, olga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > El Jueves, 16 de Noviembre de 2006 22:56, olga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx escribió:
> >> > On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 10:26 -0600, olga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >>  I wrote about kernel errors which somebody pointed out was because
> >> the
> >> >> server was running out of memory.
> >> >>
> >> >> Now I found the following which makes me think that that server may
> >> have
> >> >> been compromized.
> >> >>
> >> >> Here's what I get when I issued: netstat -nap
> >> >>
> >> >> tcp    0      0 131.x.x.x:38423       72.x.x.x:80      ESTABLISHED
> >> >> 5226/ps x
> >> >> tcp    0      0 131.x.x.x:38420       72.x.x.x:80      ESTABLISHED
> >> >> 5365/ps x
> >> >>
> >> >> About a hundred instances of that program 'ps x' running.
> >> >>
> >> >> Also here's what ps -ef produced:
> >> >>
> >> >> apache    6323     1  0 10:30 ?        00:00:00 ps x
> >> >> apache    6324     1  0 10:30 ?        00:00:00 ps x
> >> >> apache    6326     1  0 10:30 ?        00:00:00 ps x
> >> >> apache    6328     1  0 10:30 ?        00:00:00 ps x
> >> >> apache    6330     1  0 10:30 ?        00:00:00 ps x
> >> >
> >> > What does ls -l /proc/6323/exe say?  That would be a symlink to the
> >> > executable for that process.  Normal ps lives in /bin so the link
> >> should
> >> > point at /bin/ps.  If it is connecting out to a remote host, it's
> >> likely
> >> > not the normal ps, just something that's masking itself to make it
> >> less
> >> > likely to get picked up.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > David Hollis <dhollis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> apache    3102     1  0 15:53 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3104     1  0 15:53 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3106     1  0 15:53 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3108     1  0 15:53 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3110     1  0 15:53 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3112     1  0 15:53 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3114     1  0 15:53 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3116     1  0 15:53 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3118     1  0 15:53 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3120     1  0 15:53 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3122     1  0 15:53 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3125     1  0 15:54 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3127     1  0 15:54 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3129     1  0 15:54 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3131     1  0 15:54 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3133     1  0 15:54 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3135     1  0 15:54 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3137     1  0 15:54 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3139     1  0 15:54 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3141     1  0 15:54 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3143     1  0 15:54 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3145     1  0 15:54 ?        00:00:00 httpd
> >> apache    3639     1  0 15:57 ?        00:00:00 ps x
> >> apache    3642     1  0 15:57 ?        00:00:00 ps x
> >> apache    3645     1  0 15:58 ?        00:00:00 ps x
> >> apache    3647     1  0 15:58 ?        00:00:00 ps x
> >>
> >>
> >> I am getting a ton of these...
> >> Here's what ls -l /proc/3147/exe  says
> >> lrwxrwxrwx    1 apache   apache          0 Nov 16 15:56 /proc/3147/exe
> >> ->
> >> /usr/bin/perl
> >>
> >> When I do netstat -nap I get:
> >> tcp        0      0 131.x.x.x:44160       72.14.x.x:80 ESTABLISHED -
> >> tcp        0      0 131.x.x.x:44161       72.14.x.x:80 ESTABLISHED -
> >> tcp        0      0 131.x.x.x:44162       72.14.x.x:80 ESTABLISHED -
> >>
> >> The ip points to google...
> >>
> >> And these appeared in the /tmp folder:
> >>
> >> drwxrwxrwt    8 root     root         4096 Nov 16 16:00 .
> >> drwxr-xr-x   23 root     root         4096 Nov 16 14:35 ..
> >> srwx------    1 root     nobody          0 Nov 16 14:36 .fam_socket
> >> drwxrwxrwt    2 xfs      xfs          4096 Nov 16 14:35 .font-unix
> >> srw-rw-rw-    1 root     root            0 Nov 16 14:36 .gdm_socket
> >> -rw-r--r--    1 apache   apache          0 Nov 15 15:20 .httpd
> >> drwxrwxrwt    2 root     root         4096 Nov 16 14:36 .ICE-unix
> >> drwx------    2 root     root         4096 Nov 16 14:59 mc-root
> >> drwx------    2 root     root        12288 Nov 16 15:16 orbit-root
> >> -rw-r--r--    1 apache   apache          0 Nov 16 15:58
> >> sess_azx3a4wq3x1f2aad4a34sxx1w2o52a45
> >> -rw-r--r--    1 apache   apache      11669 Nov 16 15:43
> >> sess_rdav631df3a1ddfaa34s1x1wwo521459
> >> -r--r--r--    1 root     root           11 Nov 16 14:36 .X0-lock
> >> drwxrwxrwt    2 root     root         4096 Nov 16 14:36 .X11-unix
> >>
> >> What is going on?
> >>
> >
> > Finally...did they break into your system? Did you find something strange
> > on
> > the logs? I wonder what happened, give us some information this thread is
> > quite interesting and will help other folks in a near future ;-)
> > One way or another, if they got shell access (even remote text shell, you
> > know...) you should think about reinstalling your system, as far as i
> > know,
> > if the left a rootkit you must not trust your system anymore.
> >
> > By the way, let me give you and advice, installing Babel Enterprise could
> > be a
> > nice idea, ( http://babel.sourceforge.net/en/ ), yeah yeah, it's GPL ;-)
> >
> > Babel is an enterprise-grade auditing system to manage a consistency on
> > security policy between different systems in a non-homogeneus
> > architecture.
> > Babel allows to manage very different operating systems, like AIX,
> > Solaris,
> > Windows 2000, Windows XP, Linux, *BSD or HPUX.
> >
> > Babel allows administrator team to monitor the hardening level of their
> > systems and keep constantly monitored, using periodic policy polling, and
> > of
> > course, a WEB Based, graphical reporting, and of course, a centralized
> > management for all systems
> >
> > There's a demo online, try it.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> 
> It does appear that there has been a break-in. Some kind of script was
> running that was consuming all system resourses. At the time it was
> running, it was also deleting log entries, so if I looked at the log and
> searched for the time we brough the server up on the network, logs would
> show no activity at that time. And that 72.x.x.x IP was probably bogus as
> well.
> 
> Here's what I found in the httpd error log:
> 
> --06:31:56--  http://autocoutureinc.com/borek.txt
>            => `borek.txt'
> Resolving autocoutureinc.com... 208.67.181.244
> Connecting to autocoutureinc.com|208.67.181.244|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 11,666 (11K) [text/plain]
> 
>     0K .......... .                                          100%  169.99
> KB/s
> 
> 06:31:56 (169.99 KB/s) - `borek.txt' saved [11666/11666]
> 
> Died at sess_rdav631df3a1ddfaa34s1x1w2o521459 line 24.
> Died at sess_rdav631df3a1ddfaa34s1x1w2o521459 line 24.
> rm: cannot remove `borek.txt*': No such file or directory
>   % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed          Time            
> Curr.
>                                  Dload  Upload Total    Current  Left   
> Speed
> 100 11666  100 11666    0     0  23100      0  0:00:00  0:00:00  0:00:00 
> 156k
> Died at sess_dda2631df3a1ddfaa34s1x1wwo521459 line 24.
> Died at sess_dda2631df3a1ddfaa34s1x1wwo521459 line 24.
> rm: cannot remove `borek.txt*': No such file or directory
> Died at sess_edav631df3a15dfaa34s1x1wwo521459 line 24.
> Died at sess_edav631df3a15dfaa34s1x1wwo521459 line 24.
> sh: line 1: lynx: command not found
> sh: line 1: fetch: command not found
> Died at sess_tdx4d3td33a1ddfaa34s1x11x2521459 line 24.
> Died at sess_tdx4d3td33a1ddfaa34s1x11x2521459 line 24.
> --06:32:02--  http://autocoutureinc.com/borek.txt
>            => `borek.txt'
> Resolving autocoutureinc.com... 208.67.181.244
> Connecting to autocoutureinc.com|208.67.181.244|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 11,666 (11K) [text/plain]
> 
>     0K .......... .                                          100%  166.39
> KB/s
> 
> A bunch of these with other file names instead of borek.txt and other ips
> as well.
> 

Someone else has already suggested it, but I second the suggestion.
Wipe the disk clean and reformat with a new install.  

You have no idea what garbage may be laying around to bite you later if
you just try to clean it up.  A new install with a formatted disk will
at least make sure no surprises are waiting for you.


> 
> 
> 

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux