I have a sony vaio laptop, the model is vgn-bx195ep, it is celeron processor...i installed fedora 6 and everything works apart from wireless and dvd, the wireless is more important! When booting, it says that "the device does not seem to be present" but it appears in my hardware list in control centre.. Any ideas? Thanks Hugo Pecora -----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: 16 November 2006 13:25 To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 33, Issue 266 Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: ASUS P5B and FC 6 Install (Tom Browder) 2. Re: Webcam Logitech Quickcam Sphere (Alain PORTAL) 3. Re: FC-6 disappointment on AMD Athlon64 3200+ machine (Timothy Murphy) 4. Re: teTeX doesb't work on FC6 (Timothy Murphy) 5. Re: /dev/video0 (Alain PORTAL) 6. Re: FC6 Missing icons after update and terminal not starting v2 (antonio montagnani) 7. Re: Webcam Logitech Quickcam Sphere (Anne Wilson) 8. Re: Fedora Coverstory in Linux Format (Gilboa Davara) 9. Re: RAID & HDD failure recovery (Paul Howarth) 10. Re: /dev/video0 (Anne Wilson) 11. Re: /dev/video0 (Alain PORTAL) 12. Re: Hylafax package for FC6 (Paul Howarth) 13. Re: Webcam Logitech Quickcam Sphere (Alain PORTAL) 14. Re: Hylafax package for FC6 (Christian Menzel) 15. Re: /dev/video0 (Alain PORTAL) 16. OpenOffice dependency problems (after upgrade to FC6?) (Bob St John) 17. Re: /dev/video0 (Anne Wilson) 18. Re: Webcam Logitech Quickcam Sphere (Anne Wilson) 19. Re: RAID & HDD failure recovery (Bruno Wolff III) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 06:30:03 -0600 From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: ASUS P5B and FC 6 Install To: tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <8bc817ee0611160430s713c8bdct28db612959bdbdcf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 11/16/06, Timothy Murphy <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > I had a somewhat similar problem > (on an entirely different machine) > and my solution was to do an absolutely minimal install in text mode, > and then run "yum update" and "yum groupinstall" > with the various groups given by "yum grouplist". > > One of the updates was a new kernel, > and I suspect this might have worked better than > the one that came with FC-6. > > On the problem with ethernet - why not put in another ethernet card > until it is sorted? They are very cheap now. Thanks, Timothy. Good ideas--I'll give them a whirl. -Tom P.S. I'm a long-time linux user (10+ years, started with Yggdrasil), and I usually badmouth Windoze, but I must say my first impressions of Vista are very good. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:50:32 +0100 From: Alain PORTAL <alain.portal@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Webcam Logitech Quickcam Sphere To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200611161350.33898.alain.portal@xxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Le jeudi 16 novembre 2006 08:43, Ric Moore a écrit : > Re-read up there Alain! I said use gspcav1 instead of spca. It states on > that web page that spca is for much older kernels. If you are running > FC5 or 6, you want the gspca1 package. Mon Dieu! Monsieur Ric My english isn't very good and I misunderstood "kernel up from 2.6.11" and "kernel below 2.6.11" Sorry... Regards, Alain -- Les pages de manuel Linux en français http://manpagesfr.free.fr/ ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:35:32 +0000 From: Timothy Murphy <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: FC-6 disappointment on AMD Athlon64 3200+ machine To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <ejhlul$dv1$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Kip Thomas wrote: > sorry to butt in the conversation without going through all the facts. > when i encountered hangs during install it's anaconda and rpm database > corruption. do you see corruptions in the install log? No, the /root/install.log just listed the packages installed up to the point where it failed. I got FC-6 installed on this machine by doing an absolutely minimal install in text mode without X, KDE, etc, and then installing everything I needed by "yum groupinstall". I'm afraid I don't think anaconda is a very reliable installation program. I have about 50% expectation that Fedora will install without problem on a given computer, while I have 90% expectation that Knoppix will run on the same machine. As an absolutely minimal improvement, I would suggest that anaconda should allow one to try a second installation of an rpm that fails, instead of just terminating the whole thing. (Windows XP allows this - so if there is a failure to install a file, taking out the CD and re-inserting it will often allow the intstallation to continue from where it failed.) I've had several apparent rpm failures during Fedora installations, but have never had any during normal yum usage after installation. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:42:14 +0000 From: Timothy Murphy <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: teTeX doesb't work on FC6 To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <ejhmb6$dv1$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Artur G. Sibagatullin wrote: > Hi, I found that for root user I works fine! > When use sudo command it stops working well... > pdflatex still don't work for my user Conceivably, "texconfig" might help ... -- Timothy Murphy e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:59:58 +0100 From: Alain PORTAL <alain.portal@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: /dev/video0 To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200611161359.58673.alain.portal@xxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi, Le jeudi 16 novembre 2006 08:45, Tanguy Eric a écrit : > > When I load the module ("modprobe gspca"), new in messages.log: > > kernel: usbcore: registered new driver gspca > > kernel: /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/gspca_core.c: gspca > > driver 01.00.04 > The device is automatically created if the driver recognize the device. > If i do dmesg | grep gspca : > gspca: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted. > /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/gspca_core.c: USB SPCA5XX > camera found.(ZC3XX) > /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/gspca_core.c: > [spca5xx_probe:3885] Camera type JPEG > /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/Vimicro/zc3xx.h: > [zc3xx_config:515] Sensor ID:10 > /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/Vimicro/zc3xx.h: > [zc3xx_config:587] Find Sensor PAS106 > /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/gspca_core.c: > [spca5xx_getcapability:1163] maxw 352 maxh 288 minw 176 minh 144 > usbcore: registered new driver gspca > /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/gspca_core.c: gspca driver > 01.00.04 registered So, I have to understand that the driver don't recognize my cam.... > Perhaps also the device created is not /dev/vodeo0 but /dev/videoX. For > me the device change at every reboot because i have also a tv card and > the first one get /dev/video0, the second /dev/video1 and so on... I have only one video device, and none /dev/video* Regards, Alain -- Les pages de manuel Linux en français http://manpagesfr.free.fr/ ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:45:29 +0100 From: "antonio montagnani" <antonio.montagnani@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: FC6 Missing icons after update and terminal not starting v2 To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <4c37b6af0611160445s1a129b5foc0d2d812864dcdbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 2006/11/16, Jim Cornette <fc-cornette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > I have tried to run a yum groupinstall but I have a stupid problem: > > when I run a yum grouplist I get the list for example > > > > Gnome Desktop Environment > > I copied the command after running groupinstall, GNOME is capitalized. > > Run: > yum groupinstall "GNOME Desktop Environment" > > instead. > > Jim > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Tnx Jim I have made some updates/erase/installation of different packages connected to Gnome and now all icon re-appeared. Now I must solve other problems: error at start-up of Gnome (a bug has already been filed) I have lost my CD in Computer resources (only after update) I can't see other computer on my network (and it had been working for years) Terminal is not working I guess that they are connected...but I will prepare new posts. Tnx for help -- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:45:32 +0000 From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Webcam Logitech Quickcam Sphere To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200611161245.32984.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Thursday 16 November 2006 12:50, Alain PORTAL wrote: > Le jeudi 16 novembre 2006 08:43, Ric Moore a écrit : > > Re-read up there Alain! I said use gspcav1 instead of spca. It states on > > that web page that spca is for much older kernels. If you are running > > FC5 or 6, you want the gspca1 package. Mon Dieu! Monsieur Ric > > My english isn't very good and I misunderstood "kernel up from 2.6.11" > and "kernel below 2.6.11" > > Sorry... > Don't worry about it - we all get things wrong from time to time - even Ric! :-) Sometimes bulldog tactics are the only ones - hang on in there! Anne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20061116/554ca91a/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:46:48 +0200 From: Gilboa Davara <gilboad@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Fedora Coverstory in Linux Format To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1163681208.16640.12.camel@gilboa-work-dev> Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 12:28 +0000, Andy Green wrote: > Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > So? > > So Fedora is in a mindshare battle with Ubuntu, an influential print > publication has things to say that will be of interest to many Fedora > (and probably Ubuntu users). > > For example, Ubuntu is all over Digg and Fedora isn't. GNU stripped > down Ubuntu, not Fedora, to make their Holy Distro. Why is that when > Ubuntu is largely made up of the same bits and pieces, what can Fedora > do to improve that situation. Sounds interesting to me, if not to you, > just ignore it. > > -Andy A. Your post failed to include a link to the article. B. Your -original- post failed to include information on why they chose Ubuntu over Fedora. So, my question was, what exactly did you want say? Someone (I don't know) chose Ubuntu over Fedora (for some unknown reasons) or in short, "SO?" - Gilboa ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:47:57 +0000 From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: RAID & HDD failure recovery To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <455C5DFD.80903@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Laurence Vanek wrote: > I thought I knew how to do this. Thought I was prepared. > > My FC6 has a simple RAID1 setup with two ATA HDD. Three paritions on > each drive (/boot, /, swap). Three RAID devices defined (i.e. hda1 & > hdc1 for md0, hda2& hdc2 for md1, hda3 & hdc3 for md2). works great, > can boot off either drive with the other powered down. > > A week ago hda began to show disk read failures that seemed to increase > by the day (smartd). Checked hda with smartctl & hdd vendor test > software & sure enough drive was failing. > > I removed hda from arrays (marked as failed then removed with mdadm). > Shutdown & replaced with new identical drive. Plan was to boot then use: > > sfdisk -d /dev/hdc | sfdisk /dev/hda > > to copy partition table from remaining good drive to newly installed > drive. Then add new drive back into arrays. > > Surprise! boot hangs, cant find partitions on hda (of course not). > drops me to simple shell. > > I do not understand why I was not able to boot using the remaining good > drive (hdc). I had done so prior during raid testing. machine acts > like doesnt see hdc. Perhaps it's trying to boot from the first hard disk? With the new hda not installed, hdc is the first hard disk the BIOS sees and hence it works? With the new hda installed, that's the first hard disk and since there's nothing on it, it won't boot. Perhaps you could boot the rescue CD and do the "sfdisk" operation from there? Paul. ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:49:01 +0000 From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: /dev/video0 To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200611161249.01972.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Thursday 16 November 2006 12:59, Alain PORTAL wrote: > Hi, > > Le jeudi 16 novembre 2006 08:45, Tanguy Eric a écrit : > > > When I load the module ("modprobe gspca"), new in messages.log: > > > kernel: usbcore: registered new driver gspca > > > kernel: /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/gspca_core.c: gspca > > > driver 01.00.04 > > > > The device is automatically created if the driver recognize the device. > > If i do dmesg | grep gspca : > > gspca: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted. > > /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/gspca_core.c: USB SPCA5XX > > camera found.(ZC3XX) ^^^^^^^ > > /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/gspca_core.c: > > [spca5xx_probe:3885] Camera type JPEG > > /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/Vimicro/zc3xx.h: > > [zc3xx_config:515] Sensor ID:10 > > /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/Vimicro/zc3xx.h: > > [zc3xx_config:587] Find Sensor PAS106 > > /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/gspca_core.c: > > [spca5xx_getcapability:1163] maxw 352 maxh 288 minw 176 minh 144 > > usbcore: registered new driver gspca > > /var/tmp/bach-build/BUILD/gspcav1-20060925/gspca_core.c: gspca driver > > 01.00.04 registered > > So, I have to understand that the driver don't recognize my cam.... > It looks to me as though it did. > > Perhaps also the device created is not /dev/vodeo0 but /dev/videoX. For > > me the device change at every reboot because i have also a tv card and > > the first one get /dev/video0, the second /dev/video1 and so on... > > I have only one video device, and none /dev/video* > Hmm - and does opening ekiga or kopete from a terminal not give any messages? Anne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20061116/8fe2f131/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:05:04 +0100 From: Alain PORTAL <alain.portal@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: /dev/video0 To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200611161405.05788.alain.portal@xxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi, Le jeudi 16 novembre 2006 03:20, Sam Varshavchik a écrit : > The kernel module is responsible for doing a bunch of things that > eventually results in the creation of a device node. > > If you don't get a device node, it usually means that your hardware device > is not supported by the Linux kernel. Problem is that http://mxhaard.free.fr/spca5xx.html say that my cam is supported : Logitech 0x046d 0x08c2 QC Orbit/sphere MP Regards, Alain -- Les pages de manuel Linux en français http://manpagesfr.free.fr/ ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:52:17 +0000 From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Hylafax package for FC6 To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <455C5F01.7030202@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Is there any Hylafax package for Fedora Core 6 or do I have to compile > one from source? > > I only see a package for FC5. It's being reviewed for inclusion in Extras: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 You might try building the latest SRPM from the review. Paul. ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:14:43 +0100 From: Alain PORTAL <alain.portal@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Webcam Logitech Quickcam Sphere To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200611161414.46217.alain.portal@xxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi, Le jeudi 16 novembre 2006 08:53, Ric Moore a écrit : > Is it working yet? No, don't work. > I couldn't get beans to work until I did as I posted > to you, touched the config.h file, dnloaded the tar file, ran the script > and it did everything for you, depmod, modprobe, I did all of that. > all I had to do was run > kopete to see it working. I didn't use kopete, but I try xawtv, camstream, spcaview and all failed to find /dev/video0. > Stock FC6 install and kernel for logitech usb > webcam, and it showed yours to be fully supported. Ric Somebody succeeded to use this cam on FC4 https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-December/msg03998.html I wrote him, but he don't give me the solution :-( Regards, Alain -- Les pages de manuel Linux en français http://manpagesfr.free.fr/ ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:01:44 +0100 From: Christian Menzel <chris@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Hylafax package for FC6 To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1163682104.3406.55.camel@nomad> Content-Type: text/plain On Do, 2006-11-16 at 12:52 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote: > It's being reviewed for inclusion in Extras: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 > > You might try building the latest SRPM from the review. > > Paul. What's the Fedora alternative to Hylafax? I'm using Hylafax on my Debian Server for years and think of switching. Regards Chris ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:28:31 +0100 From: Alain PORTAL <alain.portal@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: /dev/video0 To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200611161428.32313.alain.portal@xxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Le jeudi 16 novembre 2006 13:49, Anne Wilson a écrit : > > I have only one video device, and none /dev/video* > > Hmm - and does opening ekiga or kopete from a terminal not give any > messages? No message with kopete. When I go in Setup->Devices->Device, there is nothing in the list. Regards, Alain -- Les pages de manuel Linux en français http://manpagesfr.free.fr/ ------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:16:41 -0500 From: Bob St John <bob@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: OpenOffice dependency problems (after upgrade to FC6?) To: fedora-list <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1163683001.7874.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain Folks, I upgraded to FC6 and are now having dependency problems with OpenOffice upgrades. I don't know whether the upgrade FC6 caused this problem or not. Messages (from yum, etc.) I get are: [('file /usr/bin/ooffice from install of openoffice.org-core-2.0.4-5.5.3 conflicts with file from package openoffice.org-core-2.0.2-5.19.2', (7, '/usr/bin/ooffice', 0L)), ('file /usr/bin/ooviewdoc from install of openoffice.org-core-2.0.4-5.5.3 conflicts with file from package openoffice.org-core-2.0.2-5.19.2', (7, '/usr/bin/ooviewdoc', 0L)), ('file /usr/bin/openoffice.org-1.9 from install of openoffice.org-core-2.0.4-5.5.3 conflicts with file from package openoffice.org-core-2.0.2-5.19.2', (7, '/usr/bin/openoffice.org-1.9', 0L)), ('file /usr/bin/openoffice.org-2.0 from install of openoffice.org-core-2.0.4-5.5.3 conflicts with file from package openoffice.org-core-2.0.2-5.19.2', (7, '/usr/bin/openoffice.org-2.0', 0L)), ('file /usr/share/mime-info/openoffice.org-2.0.keys from install of openoffice.org-core-2.0.4-5.5.3 conflicts with file from package openoffice.org-core-2.0.2-5.19.2', (7, '/usr/share/mime-info/openoffice.org-2.0.keys', 0L))] I tried uninstalling OpenOffice (successful) and reinstalling OpenOffice (unsuccessful). What is the problem? Thanks . . . Bob St. John ------------------------------ Message: 17 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:23:08 +0000 From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: /dev/video0 To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200611161323.08934.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Thursday 16 November 2006 13:28, Alain PORTAL wrote: > Le jeudi 16 novembre 2006 13:49, Anne Wilson a écrit : > > > I have only one video device, and none /dev/video* > > > > Hmm - and does opening ekiga or kopete from a terminal not give any > > messages? > > No message with kopete. > When I go in Setup->Devices->Device, there is nothing in the list. > > Regards, > Alain > Did you start it from a terminal? That usually gives you messages while it is working. Anne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20061116/f86245a1/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 18 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:22:21 +0000 From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Webcam Logitech Quickcam Sphere To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200611161322.21824.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Thursday 16 November 2006 13:14, Alain PORTAL wrote: > Hi, > > Le jeudi 16 novembre 2006 08:53, Ric Moore a écrit : > > Is it working yet? > > No, don't work. > > > I couldn't get beans to work until I did as I posted > > to you, touched the config.h file, dnloaded the tar file, ran the script > > and it did everything for you, depmod, modprobe, > > I did all of that. > > > all I had to do was run > > kopete to see it working. > > I didn't use kopete, but I try xawtv, camstream, spcaview and all failed to > find /dev/video0. > > > Stock FC6 install and kernel for logitech usb > > webcam, and it showed yours to be fully supported. Ric > > Somebody succeeded to use this cam on FC4 > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-December/msg03998.html > I wrote him, but he don't give me the solution :-( > Unless there's more than I saw, he didn't get it working. However, they were talking about a model that uses pwc. If yours has exactly the same compoents you could just try 'modprobe pwc' and see if that activates things, but I very much doubt it. I think you would have had it working quickly if that had been so. Your output given earlier talks about 'ZC3XX'. Googling for that gives a lot of references, though many of them are quite out-of-date. Anne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20061116/f0ef3177/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 19 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 07:25:22 -0600 From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: RAID & HDD failure recovery To: Laurence Vanek <lvanek@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20061116132522.GA27191@xxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 19:15:49 -0600, Laurence Vanek <lvanek@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Surprise! boot hangs, cant find partitions on hda (of course not). > drops me to simple shell. That is an odd error message. The raid devices should have names like /dev/md0 and only those names should appear in /etc/fstab. Grub refers to drive numbers, not letters, so I am wondering what is giving you that message. There are a couple of things that can cause problems. If you lost the only disk that grub was installed on (grub works with raw partitions and doesn't know about raid) then you will need to boot from a rescue CD to fix things up. Even if you made sure that grub was installed on multiple disks you still have to worry about hard drive order as after grub starts booting from the MBR of a device it finishes using a named (by hard drive order) hard drive and if that drive doesn't have what is expected on it (because that drive was lost or drives don't have the number expected after one was removed) the system won't boot. Unfortunately grub doesn't seem to have a way to say finish booting using the same drive you started on. (In my case I only have two drives, so I can just set them both to use drive 0 and be able to easily get things working with either one drive or with one drive replaced.) No matter what has happened, you should be able to fix things up by booting from the rescue CD. You should be able to repartition the new hda and use mdadm to add the partitions back into the appropiate mirrors. ------------------------------ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 33, Issue 266 ******************************************** -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
