Re: NVIDIA and DKMS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Claude Jones wrote:
The Dell DKMS package and NVIDIA driver worked as advertised for me tonight. It's the first time I'd had occasion to try it on Fedora. For those who don't know, DKMS (dynamic kernel module support) is a package available from sourceforge repo. It automatically detects a new kernel when installed, and builds the new kernel module required to run the NVIDIA driver. I'd seen it in action on another distro, previously, but had previously used the Livna repositories to get my modules for ATI and NVIDIA, waiting usually a day or two or more on occasion, before my video drivers were working again. With the installation of FC6 I decided to switch over to Freshrpms/Dries which provides the drivers and DKMS. This was my first test of an update with this new combo. This was completely painless - I installed the new kernel, rebooted, and seconds into the reboot, the message appeared that a new module was being built, which took all of about 15 seconds, then the boot proceeded normally, and I'm up and running now. This is not intended to throw gasoline on the recent pis_ing contest - I've purposefully stayed out of that. BUT, I'm curious. Is there a downside to DKMS? Why is it not being pushed more agressively? It seems to work quite well.

dkms works very well in my experience; it was the preferred method for install the ppp_mppe encryption module for a while before it got into the upstream kernel, and I made my own dkms packages for the advansys SCSI module whilst it wasn't in the Fedora kernel.

The main reason that it isn't in more widespread use is that using it requires that the end user system has a development environment (gcc, kernel-devel etc.) installed, and that's not always the case. Well, actually dkms also supports the inclusion of precompiled binary drivers in packages but that doesn't buy you much over the alternative approaches.

There was a discussion on dkms-based kernel module packages on fedora-packaging recently:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-October/msg00039.html

Paul.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux