Re: Enough, already!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 15:36 +0000, Andy Green wrote:
> Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> 
>   > I'm like Lonni
> 
> Do you work for nVidia too then?
> 
> I think Kim has a point


No, he does not have a point because 1) he is running a test kernel 2)
he has test-updates enabled 3) You don't run bleeding edge stuff on a
production machine 4) You do not expect Nvidia to release drivers for
test kernels and 5) a fully functional already compiled version of the
Nivida drivers is available on the Livna repository.  It's HIS foul by
using test stuff, not ours.

If you want to help in the development of the distro, you use the test
kernels and packages and furthermore you submit regular bug reports to
bugzilla.  That is the PURPOSE of the testing stuff; it's called
"testing" for a reason. (testing you see is the process of getting shit
to work in the first place.)  IF on the other hand you want production
level results, you use a production-stable fedora (Like FC5) with
accompanying already-compiled drivers; period-dot end of line.


> : being forced to use a fragile binary blob to 
> get the features built into the hardware is annoying.  While recognizing 
> that nVidia folk did the work on the nv driver, it is also an arbitrary 
> decision of nVidia that keeps any more advanced functionality out of nv 
> and only in the binary blob.
> 
> -Andy
> 

To make the assertion that Nvidia's decision is arbitrary is flat out
stupid.  You are basically saying that they flipped a coin as to wether
to go open source or not, that's bullshit.  What they are doing is
protecting their intellectual property by keeping portions of the driver
closed, so there isn't a damn thing that's arbitrary about it.  They
have the *right to possess and protect their own intellectual property.



LX
-- 
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
"Anybody else wanna negotiate?" -- Maj. Korben Dallas
Registered Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux