Tom Horsley wrote: > On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 03:07:05 +1100 > Steffen Kluge <kluge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Switch to postfix right now >> > > I've seen this advice many times, and I find it easy to believe that > postfix is better, having run screaming from sendmail config files > in the past, but when I recently went to read up a bit on postfix, > the very first thing I read on the home page is: > > >> Postfix attempts to be fast, easy to administer, and secure, >> while at the same time being sendmail compatible enough to not >> upset existing users. >> > > If it is sendmail compatible, doesn't that mean it has the same > config file that can be used to frighten little children? > > I'd be far more attracted to postfix if the homepage said it was > in no way remotely similar to sendmail :-). > > Beyond implementing SMTP, Postfix looks nothing at all like sendmail (thank goodness!) Configuring and operating any SMTP server is not for the faint of heart... That said, Postfix is infinitely easier to work with than sendmail, which requires true guts and serious geek credentials. Don't know about exim and others, but Postfix's design is highly modular and it works well. It's a robust, enterprise-quality system that will do anything you need with regards to email handling. Just be prepared to spend a lot of time reading the mostly excellent documentation on the Postfix website. Again: maintaining an email server (of any flavor) requires a serious commitment of time and effort. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
