On Thu November 2 2006 7:39 am, Claude Jones wrote: > On Thu November 2 2006 2:09 am, David G. Miller wrote: > > Claude Jones <claude_jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00 <--- > > > Vendor: ATA Model: ST3160023AS Rev: 3.05 > > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI > > > revision: 05 Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00 <--- > > > Vendor: ATA Model: ST3300622AS Rev: 3.AA > > > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI > > > revision: 05 > > > > It looks like the SCSI ID being assigned to these drives is > > the same. The ordered triple (Channel, ID, LUN) should be > > unique for each device. Don't know how this can happen since > > it should never happen. > > > > Unfortunately, all of the relics here don't use SATA drives > > so I can't take this any further. Also, it looks like the > > system sorts it all out by the time you get a command prompt > > so everything eventually works; you just can't do things > > automatically during the boot process. > > > > Past my bedtime here. Hope this helps. > > Sure it helps. I did see that issue, but didn't know enough to > know whether that was abnormal. I can see where that could > cause problems in the early boot process, if it is seeing two > drives as the same drive, in effect... I'm going to start a > new SATA thread on this, and see if any responds. Could just > be I've found a SATA bug... For the record: Paul Howarth had suggested a fix which post I somehow missed, to wit: "With the drive not mounted, do: $ chcon -t mnt_t /home/cj/archive You can then simulate the attempted mount at boot time: # service netfs start Alternatively you could just reboot to check that the problem is fixed for sure. Paul." This has fixed the problem... -- Claude Jones Brunswick, Md, USA -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
