On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 14:37 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I suspect that a large majority of Fedora users never look at the > wiki, so this would give a very skewed response. On the rare occasions that I've looked, I've found them next to useless. More than half of the links on the wikis seem to be about how to use the wiki, with very little information on what the wiki is supposed to be about. It sounds like a classic case of committee administration - loads of paper work, but no actual work. > What exactly is wrong with asking, or getting, feedback? > The aim of Fedora is to serve the user, isn't it, > not the developer? On the face of it, I don't have a problem with the post-install having something that allowed for a response, so long as it's done sensibly. At that stage, the internet may not be accessible, so e-mailing some response mightn't be viable. Likewise for HTTP, or other protocols. And I know I've been extremely annoyed by pop-ups after an installation on Window that nag me about registering. It'd have to be some easily, and completely ignorable, further action by the user to submit information. e.g. That default homepage in your web browser, that has the Red Hat / Fedora release notes could have a link to a survey webpage near the top. -- (Currently testing FC5, but still running FC4, if that's important.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
