We have a couple of small but critical linux environments that needed custom kernels On the environment using enterprise it is a bit inconvenient but acceptable. On the other environment we went with Fedora because the bleeding edge mods it uses are much more difficult to build otherwise. As these mods become more mainstream I am sure that we will start to unify on enterprise again. The specification of 'production use' in your question is intriguing. I would have to say that fedora is very attractive for early development, which could lend itself to more situations in the future where bleeding edge kernel mods are discovered and considered important for production use. <><Randy <><Randall Grimshaw Room 203 Machinery Hall Syracuse University Syracuse, NY 13244 315-443-5779 rgrimsha@xxxxxxx >>> mspevack@xxxxxxxxxx 10/26/2006 1:29:45 PM >>> Are you using Fedora in a production or live enviornment? Are you using large deployments of Fedora, in some sort of "critical" capacity? Do you know someone who is, and will you forward this email to them? If you are, I want to hear all about it. I'm trying to gather data for some Fedora myth-busting exercises, and also to inform some of our decision making for Fedora 7. What's your setup like? What is it about Fedora that made you choose to use it, as opposed to something else? What works well for you? What could be better? etc, etc. Anything you care to share with me. Reply on-list, reply to me directly, whatever works best for you. Thanks, Max -- Max Spevack + http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MaxSpevack + gpg key -- http://spevack.org/max.asc + fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
