Re: Problems with iPod

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I haven't topuched the nano's firmware in a long time, so that
probably isn't the problem. I unistalled gtkpod and libgpod, which
alos uninstalled amerok, and downloaded the latest tar.gz for both
from CVS.

Started with libgpod, ran ./configure, errored out with:

checking for LIBGPOD... configure: error: Package requirements
(glib-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gobject-2.0) were not met:
No package 'glib-2.0' found
No package 'gobject-2.0' found
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.
Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LIBGPOD_CFLAGS
and LIBGPOD_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.

I'm running glib-1.2.10-18.2.2, so I guess I need to update that, who
knows what that will break. I have no glib at all, so will have to
track that down as well...

ED



On 10/20/06, Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think Jamie was onto something when he asked if iTunes has updated
your ipod firmware recently.  Older versions of libgpod had problems
with a zero length sysinfo file on the ipod.  The latest version
handles is AFAIK.

> as to which versions I have at present:
>
> libgpod-0.3.0-2.2
> gtkpod-0.99.4-1.lvn5

The latest stable releases are:

    libgpod-0.4.0
    gtkpod-0.99.8

I've been using the latest libgpod/gtkpod with my 4th and 5th gen
ipods for ages and they've worked very well together.  (And, oddly, I
had a problem unmounting/ejecting my 5th gen ipod under all the FC5
kernels up until 2.6.18.)

> Where I got them - standard repositories I assume, I don't know
> enough to be grabbing from funky ones. I assume the gtkpod was from
> Livna, could that be a problem?

I don't think so, the folks at Livna do a good job at packaging
things.  But the versions are badly outdated.  libgpod is in core,
amarok is in extras, and gtkpod is from livna.  I don't know what it
would take to get libgpod updated in core.  It appears that the same
ancient version is included in FC6 as well. :(

If Jamie's suggestion about the sysinfo file doesn't help and you try
a 2.6.17 kernel and find it's still not working, I'd suggest trying to
update libgpod/gtkpod.  That's not a fun thing if you've never done
it, but it's very good to know how to do.  I can send you rpm spec
files for those if you want to build packages.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux