Re: problem installing kino on fc5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank You for Your answer.
After half of year of using fc5 I noticed that livna is the largest repository for fc5, but unfortunatelly at installation time, I read installation notes and it contained steps for using freshrpms and dries repositories.

I wonder why do You suggest me to use livna. Is it because You also noticed that this is the bigest repository or there are also any other advantages I do not realize.

Regards

Dnia 20-10-2006 o godz. 0:29 Phil Meyer napisał(a):
> Pawel wrote:
> > Hallo.
> > I have following repositories enabled:
> > 1) all fedora repositories
> > 2) dries repository
> > 3) freshrpm repository
> >
> > When I try to install kino software I ge following message:
> > [root@localhost ~]# yum install kino
> > Loading "installonlyn" plugin
> > Setting up Install Process
> > Setting up repositories
> > dries                                                                
> [1/6]
> > core                                                                 
> [2/6]
> > updates                                                              
> [3/6]
> > freshrpms                                                            
> [4/6]
> > macromedia                                                           
> [5/6]
> > extras                                                               
> [6/6]
> > Reading repository metadata in from local files
> > Parsing package install arguments
> > Resolving Dependencies
> > --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
> > ---> Downloading header for kino to pack into transaction set.
> > kino-0.9.2-1.fc5.rf.i386. 100% |=========================|  26 kB    
> 00:00
> > ---> Package kino.i386 0:0.9.2-1.fc5.rf set to be updated
> > --> Running transaction check
> > --> Processing Dependency: libx264.so.48 for package: kino
> > --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libx264.so.48 is needed by package kino
> >
> >
> > I have x264 package installed on my system, with newer vesion of 
> libx264 (50) installed on my system:
> > prompt$ rpm -qa | grep x264
> > x264-0.0.0-0.2.20060917.fc5.rf
> >
> > prompt$ rpm -ql x264
> > /usr/bin/x264
> > /usr/lib/libx264.so.50
> > /usr/share/doc/x264-0.0.0
> > /usr/share/doc/x264-0.0.0/AUTHORS
> > /usr/share/doc/x264-0.0.0/COPYING
> >
> > Have You got any idea on how to install kino?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > Masz mocne nerwy? Wejdź na stronę ociekającą diabolo pomidoro.
> > Czeka mroczna strona pełna nagród - niech myszka prowadzi Cie do:
> > http://klik.wp.pl/?adr=www.halloween.wp.pl&sid=905
> >
> >
> >   
> You are experiencing the clasic 'packaging conflicts' issues that have 
> always surrounded third party repositories.
> 
> Please understand that Dries and freshrpms and atrpms (and others) are 
> maintained by dedicated folks who have contributed much and receive 
> little in return.  They are amongst the pioneers of automated packaging 
> methods for RH and Fedora.
> 
> However, no matter how much hand waving, cursing, threatening, or 
> whatever else, these guys just have not been able to agree on the 
> conventions used for package numbering.
> 
> You can read many flame wars from the recent past on this issue, and I 
> do not wish to raise it again here.  I try to give credit where credit 
> is due.
> 
> In the case of Fedora Core 5, the third party, livna, committed to obey 
> the conventions outlined, and remain version specific to extras, 
> regardless of right, wrong, or indifferent.  Whether that constitutes a 
> 'deal', a 'sell out', a conspiracy, or whatever, does not matter.
> 
> For Fedora Core 5 I recommend to users that they keep enabled the 
> following repos:
> core
> updates
> extras
> livna
> 
> For things not found there, and there are many, then --enable freshrpms 
> (or whatever).
> Otherwise, you will begin to experience exactly what is happening here, 
> which is a versioning issue on a package that prevents others from 
> meeting a dependency.
> 
> kino is in livna ...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 

----------------------------------------------------
120 fajnych programów na Twoją komórkę! Np. Mapa Polski w Twojej
komórce... Kliknij:
http://klik.wp.pl/?adr=www.aplikacjegsm.wp.pl&sid=903


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux