Thank You for Your answer. After half of year of using fc5 I noticed that livna is the largest repository for fc5, but unfortunatelly at installation time, I read installation notes and it contained steps for using freshrpms and dries repositories. I wonder why do You suggest me to use livna. Is it because You also noticed that this is the bigest repository or there are also any other advantages I do not realize. Regards Dnia 20-10-2006 o godz. 0:29 Phil Meyer napisał(a): > Pawel wrote: > > Hallo. > > I have following repositories enabled: > > 1) all fedora repositories > > 2) dries repository > > 3) freshrpm repository > > > > When I try to install kino software I ge following message: > > [root@localhost ~]# yum install kino > > Loading "installonlyn" plugin > > Setting up Install Process > > Setting up repositories > > dries > [1/6] > > core > [2/6] > > updates > [3/6] > > freshrpms > [4/6] > > macromedia > [5/6] > > extras > [6/6] > > Reading repository metadata in from local files > > Parsing package install arguments > > Resolving Dependencies > > --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. > > ---> Downloading header for kino to pack into transaction set. > > kino-0.9.2-1.fc5.rf.i386. 100% |=========================| 26 kB > 00:00 > > ---> Package kino.i386 0:0.9.2-1.fc5.rf set to be updated > > --> Running transaction check > > --> Processing Dependency: libx264.so.48 for package: kino > > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > > Error: Missing Dependency: libx264.so.48 is needed by package kino > > > > > > I have x264 package installed on my system, with newer vesion of > libx264 (50) installed on my system: > > prompt$ rpm -qa | grep x264 > > x264-0.0.0-0.2.20060917.fc5.rf > > > > prompt$ rpm -ql x264 > > /usr/bin/x264 > > /usr/lib/libx264.so.50 > > /usr/share/doc/x264-0.0.0 > > /usr/share/doc/x264-0.0.0/AUTHORS > > /usr/share/doc/x264-0.0.0/COPYING > > > > Have You got any idea on how to install kino? > > > > Regards > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Masz mocne nerwy? Wejdź na stronę ociekającą diabolo pomidoro. > > Czeka mroczna strona pełna nagród - niech myszka prowadzi Cie do: > > http://klik.wp.pl/?adr=www.halloween.wp.pl&sid=905 > > > > > > > You are experiencing the clasic 'packaging conflicts' issues that have > always surrounded third party repositories. > > Please understand that Dries and freshrpms and atrpms (and others) are > maintained by dedicated folks who have contributed much and receive > little in return. They are amongst the pioneers of automated packaging > methods for RH and Fedora. > > However, no matter how much hand waving, cursing, threatening, or > whatever else, these guys just have not been able to agree on the > conventions used for package numbering. > > You can read many flame wars from the recent past on this issue, and I > do not wish to raise it again here. I try to give credit where credit > is due. > > In the case of Fedora Core 5, the third party, livna, committed to obey > the conventions outlined, and remain version specific to extras, > regardless of right, wrong, or indifferent. Whether that constitutes a > 'deal', a 'sell out', a conspiracy, or whatever, does not matter. > > For Fedora Core 5 I recommend to users that they keep enabled the > following repos: > core > updates > extras > livna > > For things not found there, and there are many, then --enable freshrpms > (or whatever). > Otherwise, you will begin to experience exactly what is happening here, > which is a versioning issue on a package that prevents others from > meeting a dependency. > > kino is in livna ... > > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > ---------------------------------------------------- 120 fajnych programów na Twoją komórkę! Np. Mapa Polski w Twojej komórce... Kliknij: http://klik.wp.pl/?adr=www.aplikacjegsm.wp.pl&sid=903 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
