On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 21:32 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > same place - they just have to be on > > machines where there is no question about your access to the logs. > > And how much bandwidth does it take to distribute one file that > > changes once a month? > > You wanted all the mirrors hosted by the project under the same control. > Thats not just one file. What I suggested in the first place was a new/different repository containing _only_ one file, updated monthly or so with the count of downloads of itself (packaged in rpm format so yum knows what to do, of course). That gets you a count of how many people are currently running and updating any version with the default update settings. You seem to be talking about something other than my suggestion. > That is about introducing say a first boot feature which gives users the > ability to opt in and provide more features. Kindly read the archive of > the FAB list that I pointed out earlier for more details. If you are going to build some new concept, the most useful metric would be how often a program from any package is executed. This could be be used both locally and for the distribution to weed out stuff that is not needed and focus development attention on the things that are getting the most active use. Even better, collect the access data at the per-file level locally in a form that can be used for disk optimization and send/collate summary information from that as it relates to packages. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
