On Friday 29 September 2006 19:38, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 10:13 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > > > Yet we all have to endure your although very secure 19 line text > > > siganture... > > > > > > ;-) > > > > Do you mean the gpg signature? If so, yes. Unlike html this is a > > security feature not a liability. > > How much of a feature is having your mail program do some extra > work to report this - on the message I'm replying to: > > The signature of this message cannot be verified, it > may have been altered in transit. > > gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) > gpg: Signature made Fri 29 Sep 2006 04:13:56 AM CDT using DSA key ID > BFE7357F > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > > It doesn't give me any warm fuzzies... > Today 10:13:51 Message was signed by cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Key ID: 0x90502F32BFE7357F). The signature is valid and the key is ultimately trusted. I don't know why you can't find it - it's on several keyservers to my knowledge. Anne
Attachment:
pgpOY5dB2AP2O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
